Monday, March 28, 2011

Martin Marincin's Comparisons and Projections: Season-End Review

Last December, I did a mid-season assessment of Martin Marincin's offensive production in the WHL, using point/game and size comparisons with other high-profile blueline prospects to come out of the CHL in the past. He was on a ridiculous pace, scoring above point/game, on level with some of the elite offensive defensemen in the NHL today. - what made it more amazing was he was doing it with a large 6'4 frame. Most of the high-point producers in the CHL are smaller defensemen who have already grown into their bodies and can play the offensive game more easily than players 6'2 and above. Marincin's ability to produce this kind of output given his size made Oiler fans drool at the potential.

However, his production slowed as the season came to an end, as he went from 35 points in 33 games in December to 56 points in 67 games at season's end. Many have speculated as to why it happened. Was the first half of the year an anomaly? Was the 70-game schedule simply too much for a player who'd previously never played more than 40 games in a season? Were teams able to identify ways to stop him? Did the Prince George Cougars undergo any internal changes that limited his offensive role? It's hard to speculate at this point, but I think it's safe to say his first WHL season was a great success. Here's a re-do of that table from December, this time using his final statistics, and using only 6'2+ defensemen from the CHL over the past 10 years.

TOP POINT/GAME OF 6'2+ NHL DEFENSEMEN IN THE CHL AT AGES 18/19

Name
Age
HT
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
P
P/G
Keith Yandle
19
6.02
QMJHL
66
25
59
84
1.27
Jay Bouwmeester
18
6.04
WHL
61
11
50
61
1.00
Cam Fowler
18
6.02
OHL
55
8
47
55
1.00
Luc Bourdon
18
6.02
QMJHL
20
2
18
20
1.00
Cam Barker
18
6.03
WHL
52
15
33
48
0.92
Marc Staal
18
6.04
OHL
57
11
38
49
0.86
Alex Edler
19
6.03
WHL
62
13
40
53
0.85
Martin Marincin
18
6.04
WHL
67
14
42
56
0.84
Luca Sbisa
18
6.02
WHL
18
4
11
15
0.83
Alex Pietrangelo
18
6.03
OHL
36
8
21
29
0.81
Tyler Myers
18
6.07
WHL
58
9
33
42
0.72
Travis Hamonic
18
6.02
WHL
57
13
27
40
0.70
Dion Phaneuf
18
6.02
WHL
62
19
24
43
0.69
Brent Seabrook
18
6.03
WHL
61
12
29
41
0.67
Braydon Coburn
18
6.05
WHL
55
10
20
30
0.55
Shea Weber
18
6.04
WHL
60
12
20
32
0.53
Jared Cowen
18
6.05
WHL
59
8
22
30
0.51
Jeff Schultz
18
6.06
WHL
72
2
27
29
0.40
These are still some spectacular stats, especially given the fact that Marincin was playing one of the weakest teams in the WHL. His point productoin at age 18 is up with some of the higher-profile 1st round picks from the past decade - just look at some of the names below his on the table! He still remains a high-profile offensive prospect for the Oilers, and looks to be a 2nd-round steal like Travis Hamonic (2008) and Shea Weber (2003) were in their drafts.

Apart from the late-season decline in production, there is one other negative for Marincin: he had the fourth-worst +/- rating on the team, with a -12 rating to finish the year. I know the Cougars are a bad team, but that doesn't look good for a guy being suggested as a future top-pairing guy. However, even Travis Hamonic was a -31 in his 18-year old season - and he's doing fine on the NYI blue line today.

So even with the doom and gloom expressed by some Oiler fans about Marincin's late-season struggles, it's still safe to say his rookie season in the WHL is one of the best 18-year old seasons for a big defenseman in recent history - Stu MacGregor certainly worked his magic in picking him up.

2 comments:

  1. Wow, when you put it in this perspective he really did have a great season. If he lives up to be anywhere near some of the other guys on that list I will be a very happy Oiler fan!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It will be interesting to see what he can do next year, now that he's more used to the extended schedule and different culture. To put up those numbers is quite impressive, but to do so as a WHL rookie who could barely speak English playing twice as much hockey as he ever had before? That shows true promise.

    ReplyDelete